Many of the things we’re supposed to do to “save the earth” fall
into the category of onerous tasks requiring more time, money, and effort than
their less eco-friendly alternatives.
For example, we know it’s good to bike to the food co-op to
fill our reusable hemp bags with local organic produce, but we’re more likely
to just hop in the car and grab some plastic-wrapped Chinese take-out.
Indeed, even among those who care deeply about the
environment, most are too busy or too lazy to consistently perform out-of-the-way
eco-chores. Here’s the unfortunate reality: If saving the environment depends
on a majority of the citizenry voluntarily doing things in more difficult, expensive, and time-consuming ways, it won’t happen. I
see three ways to get around that:
1.
By making it the LAW to be green. We already
have environmental laws that apply to industries and organizations. Perhaps in
the future we’ll have more laws governing individual behavior as well, like
fines for not recycling. I can’t imagine this being popular, but who knows?
2.
By having economic INCENTIVES to be green, like extra taxes and fees on products and services that are bad for the environment combined with subsidies for products and services that are good for the environment. (Currently a lot of our laws do the opposite of this, like subsidizing eco-nasty fossil fuels, meats, and sugar while putting fees on eco-friendly solar power, etc.)
3.
By emphasizing how some kinds of LAZINESS can
actually be greener than industriousness. This would get us away from the
stifling notion that being green always requires extra work, but it would require
removing existing taboos against certain types of laziness.
In this blog post I’ll focus on eco-friendly laziness by
giving examples of specific ways that less work can accomplish more good for
the environment.
Examples of eco-friendly laziness that we should embrace:
1.
Cleaning
Less. Cleaning the house consumes a lot of electrical energy and pollutes
the environment with nasty detergents, disinfectants, and disposable cleaning
implements. And it’s a pain in the ass. Save the environment by cleaning less
often and less thoroughly.
2.
Lazy
Laundering. Doing laundry is also a big environmental burden, which wastes
water and energy and contaminates the water. Embrace your lazy distain for
laundry by re-wearing clothes until they start to actually look and smell
dirty, then re-wear them one more time as your working-out or fixing-the-car
clothes. Underwear and t-shirts may not last more than one or two uses, but
pants or an outer shirt could go for a week. Another lazy aspect of
eco-laundering involves washing all your clothes in big, unsorted loads on the
cold setting. Yes, some of your whites may turn strange colors, but that just
marks you as a true earth-saver.
3.
Letting the
Lawn Go. Lawn care is labor intensive, energy-intensive, water-intensive, and
chemical intensive. Fresh water, in particular is a precious resource that
should be reserved for drinking, irrigation of food crops, and supporting
natural wetlands and waterways. Also, lawn fertilizer is notorious for leaching
into streams and groundwater and then causing harmful algae blooms in lakes and
rivers. Even if the costs of maintaining a “perfect” lawn weren’t so high, the
lawn itself is an eco-loser: It has very low biodiversity (only 1 plant species)
and provides only a fraction of the beneficial functions of a
naturally-vegetated area. Lawns give little food or hiding places for animals,
no energy-saving shade or wind protection for your house, and minimal runoff and
erosion control. So you should let your lawn be taken over by the natural vegetation that grows in your area,
which doesn’t require watering or fertilizer. Trade your mower for a machete,
and just cut a path through the brambles to your door. Caveat: I recognize that communities and individuals have a legitimate
need to maintain certain open areas for sports fields, public assembly grounds,
etc., and that mowed lawn is better for these areas in comparison with alternatives
like pavement or bare dirt. I'm just saying that if something doesn’t NEED to
be lawn, the best thing we can do for the environment is to be lazy and let
nature take it over.
4.
Working
Less. Working less is good for
the environment because it means you’ll be driving less, using less gas and
creating fewer greenhouse gas emissions. Also, since you won’t be making as
much money you’ll be buying less; eschewing the goods and services that you
don’t really need. (See #5)
5.
Not
Bothering to Shop. Being too lazy to shop for food and stuff is good for
the environment because not buying as much means that less will be produced.
This reduces the consumption of energy and raw materials and reduces pollution.
Also, your being too lazy to shop forces you to efficiently use up every last
bit of what you have, so there is less waste accumulating in your house or
going to the landfill.
6.
Giving Up
the Fight. Much is made of the irrepressible, industrious spirit that
inspires men and women to rebuild after a natural disaster, or to invest
millions and billions in engineering projects to fight the destructive forces
of nature. Sometimes, though, that spirit is foolishly applied to losing
battles; situations where a tactical retreat would lead to a better outcome for
both humanity and the environment. So instead of praising those who go the hard
way to rebuild and maintain their increasingly vulnerable holdings, we should
praise those who take the “lazy” way and cede their land to nature.
Well, that’s about all that I can think of for now. Do y’all
have any of your own ideas of ways we could apply laziness to sustaining the
environment?
